and did not include a demand

The Financial Times said it had seen the “final version” of the agreement, which it said was dated February 24 and did not include a demand for $500 billion. The deal would “establish a fund into which Ukraine would contribute 50 percent of proceeds from the ‘future monetization’ of state-owned mineral resources, including oil and gas, and associated logistics,” the newspaper reported, and the fund would “invest in projects in Ukraine.” According to the newspaper, the deal excludes mineral resources that already contribute to Ukrainian state coffers, “meaning it would not cover the existing activities of Naftogaz or Ukrnafta, Ukraine’s largest gas and oil producers.” สล็อต เว็บตรง